You should analyze a lot of different articles and books to conduct an excellent research, prepare an outline and choose the right writing style. This task is usually complicated for students and they really need an additional help to solve this problem. We decided to prepare a short analytical essay example, which you can use as a manual in the future.
Thank you for taking the time out of your busy day to study society. The social conflict approach is an approach to social theory that argues that society is characterized by various inequalities and conflicts that cause people to act socially, producing change. The point is to change it.
This perspective bumps heads with the structural-functional perspective pretty clearly.
Society, according to the social conflict approach, is not harmonious. So this approach is really all about analyzing inequalities of race, class, gender, and ethnicity, and the social conflicts which result.
Primarily, these conflicts are going to result in change, changes that will move society. So Marx was a German economist and sociologist. He was living at the time capitalism was industrializing and developing so he got to see firsthand the atrocities of exploitation within capitalist production in factories in London.
A lot of his worldview and philosophy came from going to observe these really poor working conditions in the trenches. I mean, children were being overworked and exploited, working really long hours and things like that.
So for Marx then, class conflict is really the motor of history. And by that we mean, the motor of history, we mean the driving force causing change in society, class conflict. They owned nothing other than their own bodies, and they could sell their labor to the capitalist.
So that is a fundamental inequality from the start, and that was very problematic for Marx. This stands for money, M, and this is more money, money prime, and this is a commodity in the middle. So to take an example, suppose Apple computers, it wants to produce computers and distribute them.
Well, it starts with some money initially, and then with that money, it buys commodities. It buys the inputs that are used in the computers. It buys the factories to produce the computers.
And critically for Marx, it buys the labor to produce, to tie everything together. So takes all the inputs with its initial money, puts them together in the factories, and out turns computers that everyone buys. So in that way, it could be fundamentally exploitative.
So you see in the news infor instance, about Apple getting in trouble for not paying its store employees enough and for exploiting its workers in China, in the factories.
So this is how Marx saw class conflict and capitalism as fundamentally exploitative.
And for him, such a corrosive, conflict-ridden society would inevitably come apart and lead to a revolution where the laborers would challenge the capitalists. Next, we have Max Weber who was also a German sociologist, and he wrote a little bit after Marx.
Marx was writing in the midth century, around to or so, and Weber starts to write in the late s to the early s. And to this end, Weber was concerned more with power and social honor than he was with the ownership of property like Marx was.
So of course you can achieve power and social honor by owning property, by being a capitalist, but Weber thought there were other means to achieve power than just this.
So what Weber did was he gave us this idea that groups were constantly vying for social honor, prestige, and power, and once a group of people got that, they did it all they could to push everybody else away and sequester themselves, isolate themselves, and secure and hold on to that power.
So again, although we moved beyond class conflict being defined by property like Marx had, this is still a very fundamentally conflict-based view of society. Next, we have American sociologist C. Wright Mills, what he does, he comes along.Environmental Documentaries “The Earth Is What We All Have In Common.” –Wendell Barry "A human being is part of the whole, called by us "Universe," a part limited in time and space.
The social conflict theory is very old and there are a lot of additional theories and point of view, which people use to improve the first idea.
However, what does the social conflict theory mean? The pioneer on this theory was H. Spenser. As Victor pointed out, conflict theory (like most social theories) is strongest at the group level of analysis and weaker at the individual level.
But beyond that: Conflict theory is really good at helping us understand the social mechanics behind competing groups, and especially competing groups for which there's a significant power differential. This theory is a social psychological theory thought to explain prejudice (Conflict Theories, ).
An example for this would be immigration. With all the bombings, terrorist attacks, and violence from one ethnic group or religious group. We explain Social Conflict Theory with video tutorials and quizzes, using our Many Ways(TM) approach from multiple teachers.
This lesson will explain, define and discuss the key ideas and the basic components of social conflict theory, identifying it . Social conflict theory sees social life as a competition and focuses on the distribution of resources, power, and inequality.
Conflict theorists view society as an arena of inequality that generates social conflict and social change. Karl Marx is considered the father of social conflict theory.
In doing so, he offered a theory of capitalism and class conflict .