The Role of the Cafeteria Article By:
Search this page Policy The teacher-student relationship lies at the foundation of the educational process.
As a matter of sound judgment and professional ethics, faculty members have a responsibility to avoid any apparent or actual conflict between their professional responsibilities and personal relationships with students. In such relationships, voluntary consent by the student is suspect because of the inherently unequal nature of the relationship.
In addition, other faculty members, staff members, or students may express concerns about undue access or advantage, favoritism, restricted opportunities, or unfavorable treatment as a result of the relationship.
These concerns are damaging whether the favoritism is real or perceived. They also arise in cases where the relationship between the faculty member and the student remains amicable, as well as in cases that lead to accusations of exploitation. In spite of these warnings, the University recognizes that sometimes such relationships occur.
When a conflict of this nature occurs, the faculty member must disclose the relationship so that a resolution to the conflict can be sought.
This policy applies to any University or University-sanctioned teacher, mentor, or supervisor of students. This includes, but is not limited to, regular instructional faculty, clinical faculty, supplemental and research faculty, postdoctoral fellows, graduate student instructors, graduate student research assistants, preceptors, and graders.
Definition Supervisory Responsibility includes, but is not limited to, teaching, research, academic advising, coaching, service on evaluation or thesis committees, grading, recommending in an institutional capacity for employment, fellowships, or awards.
This supervision can occur on or off campus, in curricular, co-curricular, or extra-curricular activities.
Regulations Prohibition of Supervision: A written plan to resolve the conflict of interest should be developed by the faculty member, the academic administrator in most cases, the department chairand the head of the academic unit e. For these reasons, the student must find the plan to be acceptable.
Final approval of the plan is the responsibility of the head of the academic unit e. Determination of Plan Acceptability: Therefore, the academic administrator and the head of the academic unit e. Role of the Academic Administrator: If an academic administrator learns of a potential conflict of interest from another source e.
Impact on Third Parties: This policy does not preempt existing codes of student conduct. University administrators need to respond appropriately to all conflicts of interest that arise under this policy.
Within this context, every reasonable effort will be made to preserve confidentiality and protect the privacy of all parties in the course of investigating a potential conflict of interest or, where a conflict of interest exists, in attempting to develop an alternative plan for supervision of the student.
Sanctions Violations of this policy will be considered misconduct on the part of a faculty member and will be subject to institutional sanctions up to and including termination of appointment. Student supervisors or graduate student teachers e.
Violations of this policy include: The faculty member discloses the relationship but fails to cooperate in the development of a satisfactory plan to resolve the conflict of interest see Section III. Development and Approval of a Conflict Resolution Plan or fails to adhere to an agreed-upon plan.Online homework and grading tools for instructors and students that reinforce student learning through practice and instant feedback.
Carroll County Schools wishes to meet the needs of all of its students and families. If any member of your family needs assistance or has any questions regarding mobility impaired issues or handicapped access, please contact the principal of your local school. The Virginia Department of Education, Office of, provides adult literacy services, adult high school equivalency completion, Adult Education and Literacy, Second Language services to Virginia's adults.
The Efficacy of Student Retention: A Review of Research & Literature A project prepared for the Academic Services Department by Amanda Tolen and Landi Quinlin. i retention policy in school districts, according to the literature. For example, Chicago public. Frequently Asked Questions.
Scheduling government records.
A retention and disposition schedule is a plan of action that indicates the period of time you should retain your records. Records schedules allow you to dispose of records in a timely, systematic manner by setting retention and disposal guidelines based on administrative, legal, fiscal, or research needs.
Policy. The teacher-student relationship lies at the foundation of the educational process.
As a matter of sound judgment and professional ethics, faculty members have a responsibility to avoid any apparent or actual conflict between their professional responsibilities and personal relationships with students.